A whole lotta Nothing

I introduced the notion of “Wu” quite superficially and off-handedly in my first article Ex Sistere and then said no more about it, other than my position that “Wu” is the before-the-big-bang.

But that’s bad form. In truth, I wanted to get on to other concepts. Now it’s time to look at things again and go back…

… way, way back… Back to when the universe was a trillion times smaller than the dot at the end of this sentence. I’m talking t=0, not t=1×10-99.

The Universe was hardly a quiver, barely a tremor. Now go back just that little bit more; to t=-1×10-99, to when all is still and unmoving.

Whoops! You actually went back too far. You went back to t=-1×10100! How to do you get back from there to here? Well, you could at least go half-way, right? Ok, so go ahead. Look around you. Did you even move? You still seem just as far away to me. Try again. Ah, so now you’re at t=-2×10-99. Or are you?

What’s this game I’m playing with you? Well, it’s to show you that before the big bang, neither space nor time had any relevant meaning – they didn’t exist, couldn’t exist. Everything was sameness in every possible dimension.

And it could have stayed that way for a million trillion years or a million trillionths of a second – we’d have no way of knowing.

You’re in ‘irrelational’ space-time, pure and whole “Wu”, nothing-and-everything, absolute isotropy, pure topological symmetry.

And yet it exists! It more-than-exists even, because this is that from which existence (our existence) emerges. And we know something happened to get us out of this sameness because we’re here to wonder about such things.

Now, I can’t honestly say something like “Well, obviously “Wu” didn’t ‘like’ staying the same because it changed and the big bang happened” because attributing such a sentiment (as an analogy for the inherent instability of ‘Wu’) means I’m thinking that ‘Wu’ didn’t last long – but I’m forgetting that it also lasted eternally (we’ve got to abandon time-related words!). So I could equally dishonestly say “‘Wu’ loved being the same and it’s astonishing to think that it changed at all.” A religious person might be inclined to think that their God is what/who ‘tipped the scale’ and pushed ‘Wu’ to change.

But we must be aware that tergiversating about ‘how long Wu lasted’ is sheer wrong-headedness!

The key is to think that Wu always was, yes, but it still is. It’s to realize not only was Wu perfect sameness but it is also the most fundamental ‘stuff’ everywhere, right now.

How can that be? Well, for starters we’re finally beginning to ask the right questions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *